14
May
Weak associations may be causal but it is harder to rule out bias and confounding. Epidemiologists are usually very careful not to use causal language.
This module starts by introducing the distinction between association and causation which is critical not only for epidemiology but for research in general.
Association and causation in epidemiology. The process of causal inference is complex and arriving at a tentative inference of a causal or non-causal nature of an association is a subjective process. For a comprehensive discussion on causality refer to Rothman. Hennekens CH Buring JE.
Epidemiology in Medicine Lippincott Williams Wilkins 1987. Association and causation in epidemiology - half a century since the publication of Bradford Hills interpretational guidance. Half a century after the publication of Bradford Hills detailed examination of epidemiological association and causation his paper is still of substantial relevance today possibly more so given the number of epidemiological studies that are now undertaken.
The Bradford Hill criteria listed below are widely used in epidemiology as a framework with which to assess whether an observed association is likely to be causal. 1 Strength of association The stronger the association or magnitude of the risk between a risk factor and outcome the more likely the relationship is thought to be causal. Association-Causation in Epidemiology.
Stories of Guidelines to Causality. A profound development in the analysis and interpretation of evidence about CVD risk and indeed for all of epidemiology was the evolution of criteria or guidelines for causal inference from statistical associations attributed commonly nowadays to the USPHS Report of the. This module starts by introducing the distinction between association and causation which is critical not only for epidemiology but for research in general.
Subsequently you will learn all the main measures epidemiologists use to quantify association. Mainly risk and rate differences and risk rate and odds ratios. Association versus Causation When considering the relationship between exposures and health outcomes it is important to distinguish between association and causation.
Epidemiologists ultimately want to be able to draw conclusions about causation but most epidemiologic studies focus on establishing associations. Determining When Associations Are Causal in Epidemiologic Studies. As mentioned in chapter 4 in epidemiology we look for evidence that exposures and outcomes are associated statistically.
Epidemiologists are usually very careful not to use causal language. The key to epidemiologic analysis is comparison. Occasionally you might observe an incidence rate among a population that seems high and wonder whether it is actually higher than what should be expected based on say the incidence rates in other communities.
Provides an estimate of the incidence of a disease in a population that is associated with or attributed to the exposure or risk factor in question provided the association is causal 15. A PAR computed for water hardness should be cautiously interpreted since cardiovascular. Causation is an essential concept in the practice of epidemiology.
Causal claims like smoking causes cancer or human papilloma virus causes cervical cancer have long been a standard part of the epidemiology literature. But despite much discussion of causes it is not clear that epidemiologists are referring to a single shared concept. Association from causation.
A study that shows an association between factor X and health effect Y in cultured cells in experimental animals or even in a human population group does not necessarily imply that X causes Y. Many such studies are preliminary reports that cannot justify any valid claim of causation without considerable additional. While the epidemiologic triad serves as a useful model for many diseases it has proven inadequate for cardiovascular disease cancer and other diseases that appear to have multiple contributing causes without a single necessary one.
Host refers to the human who can get the disease. A variety of factors intrinsic to the host sometimes called risk factors can influence an individuals exposure. If there were epidemiological reports of positive statistical associations in the nearer future the question might not be association or causation.
Rather we may be facing the following equation. In simple albeit provocative words bring us the associations and we will call it causation. Strong associations are more likely to be causal because they are unlikely to be due entirely to bias and confounding.
Weak associations may be causal but it is harder to rule out bias and confounding. Judging the causal significance of an association or causation is both a science and an art. The gold standard for determining what is an association and what is actual causation is described in a 1964 Surgeon Generals Report on this topic.
Definition of causality Causality can be defined as cause effect relationship In epidemiology cause is the exposure and effect is disease or death Causal relation is a complex phenomenon The concept of cause itself continues to be debated as a philosophical matter in the scientific literature. Association is the same as dependence and may be due to direct or indirect causation. Correlation implies specific types of association such as monotone trends or clustering but not causation.